A Hyperlink to The Ministry for Diaspora Affairs and Combating Antisemitism Landing Page

[himuhumaira]

I was thinking today how AI output is reliable for tort case judgements as it is 75% reliable. Criminal certainty level judgements of 100% likely cannot be supported by AI output however. MASCE MASME MIEEE MIET MBCS ACIARB says all that. The other side of me however, the musician, the actor, and the farmer all say something else. The big tech companies are phone number library all mainly investing in AI infrastucture now which basically means Nvidia GPUs. AI is artificial and it is intelligence, but basically I have concluded recently big tech is investing in intelligence, and it has already captured the 75% likely tort case evidence judgements. What is tort law is now what is big tech? Civil negligence etc. The world is changing fast. Not good enough yet for criminal negligence yet though the big tech AI.

Why all this ranting? Is it simply ego mania? Perhaps but debt to society is the main reason. Society educated me so it is doing the right thing to put some knowledge back. With AI deciding who lives and who dies in war reality of war sinks home though. War is all average, and imperfect, and luck and unluck. Lots and lots of the wrong people die and get killed. Intelligence is what big tech has invested in though and they outrank me in power, IQ, money, and probably wisdom. The intelligence they now have in their Nvidia GPUs can be trained. But on what? War? Drugs? Medicine? Shares? So much intelligence now but nothing to train it on. People my age are cropping up in the obituaries more and more now.